From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: hch <hch@infradead.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Ed Lin <ed.lin@promise.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@osdl.org>,
promise_linux <promise_linux@promise.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Promise 'stex' driver
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:21:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C3DA2F.1090107@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060723194539.GB25789@infradead.org>
hch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:01:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> I think it's highly rude to presume that someone who has so-far been
>> responsive, and responsible, will suddenly not be so. That is not the
>> way to encourage vendors to join the Linux process.
>
> But it is like that in practice. I know more than enough examples where
> there is no more incentive to fix things up once it's in, heck I'm guilty
> of that myself. It has to do with beeing lazy and not wanting to change code
> anymore once it has settled.
I agree -- but in this case we have direct evidence to the contrary.
I'll stay on their back, if nothing else...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-19 15:07 [PATCH] Promise 'stex' driver Ed Lin
2006-07-20 21:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-20 23:55 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-21 0:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 1:07 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-21 1:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 1:38 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-21 2:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 2:36 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-21 3:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 3:18 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-21 3:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 12:13 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-23 19:45 ` hch
2006-07-23 20:21 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-23 19:44 ` hch
2006-07-21 1:06 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] <NONAMEBFJ3sl3xbYiMC000000d4@nonameb.ptu.promise.com>
2006-07-25 9:26 ` hch
2006-07-26 1:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-25 17:30 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-10 16:08 Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-10 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-10 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-10 16:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-10 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-10 17:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 18:22 ` James Bottomley
2006-06-10 18:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 22:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-10 17:47 ` Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C3DA2F.1090107@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=ed.lin@promise.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=promise_linux@promise.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox