From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: ricknu-0@student.ltu.se
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>,
Shorty Porty <getshorty_@hotmail.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
larsbj@gullik.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:26:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C3DB6C.6010800@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1153683377.44c3cfb146443@portal.student.luth.se>
ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote:
>>> +#undef false
>>> +#undef true
>>> +
>>> +enum {
>>> + false = 0,
>>> + true = 1
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define false false
>>> +#define true true
>> Can someone please tell me what advantage 'define true true' is going to
>> bring, besides than being able to '#ifdef true'?
>
> Assembly-code can not use enum but #define. That is the reason I find but there
> might be more.
That won't work -- the #define just makes the enum available, which
doesn't work at the assembler level.
But assembly code doesn't use this stuff, so no worries.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-19 20:38 [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean ricknu-0
2006-07-19 21:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-19 23:17 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-20 0:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-20 3:04 ` Vadim Lobanov
2006-07-20 3:53 ` Shorty Porty
2006-07-20 3:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-20 8:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-04 14:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 14:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 14:35 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 15:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 15:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 16:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 16:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-04 18:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-04 18:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 19:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-06 9:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-06 9:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-06 9:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-06 15:31 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-08-04 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 16:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-19 21:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-07-19 22:47 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-19 23:52 ` Peter Williams
2006-07-20 0:08 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-20 8:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 1:24 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2) ricknu-0
2006-07-21 1:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 8:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-21 21:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-25 19:04 ` Roman Kononov
2006-07-21 22:31 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 19:56 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-21 14:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 18:27 ` Michael Buesch
2006-07-21 21:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-21 22:11 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 8:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-21 23:08 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3) ricknu-0
2006-07-21 23:27 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 5:40 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-22 17:08 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 18:08 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-22 8:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-22 17:19 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-22 9:55 ` Lars Gullik Bjønnes
2006-07-23 15:43 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 15:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4) ricknu-0
2006-07-23 16:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-23 19:36 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 20:26 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-23 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-23 21:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-23 21:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-24 8:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-23 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2006-07-23 19:46 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-23 20:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-23 21:13 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-25 23:22 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 5) ricknu-0
2006-07-26 0:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-26 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6) ricknu-0
2006-07-27 1:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 2:10 ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-27 3:51 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 4:40 ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-27 4:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 3:30 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-28 16:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-27 2:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-27 3:22 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 5:27 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-27 6:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-27 19:55 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-27 20:13 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-28 1:29 ` ricknu-0
2006-07-28 1:56 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-28 12:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-28 20:24 ` Lars Noschinski
2006-07-28 21:31 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-27 19:46 ` [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 7) ricknu-0
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C3DB6C.6010800@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=getshorty_@hotmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=larsbj@gullik.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=vlobanov@speakeasy.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox