From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932134AbWGXMfY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:35:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932135AbWGXMfY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:35:24 -0400 Received: from amnafzar.com ([80.75.9.40]:54024 "EHLO amnafzar.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932134AbWGXMfX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:35:23 -0400 X-Antivirus-SharifSecureWare-Mail-From: alishahi@amnafzar.com via parssign.amnafzar.com X-Antivirus-SharifSecureWare: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.10.1):. Processed in 0.057984 secs Process 483) Message-ID: <44C4BDD4.8050800@amnafzar.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:02:20 +0430 From: "S.Mehdi Sheikhalishahi" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML Subject: why SFQ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Why linux users use SFQ as leaf queueing discipline instead of RED and other? -- Best Regards, S.Mehdi Sheikhalishahi, Bye.