From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932460AbWGYFDl (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932461AbWGYFDl (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:41 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:25296 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932460AbWGYFDk (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:40 -0400 Message-ID: <44C5A629.8090602@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:37 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Boldi CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org References: <200607241857.38889.a1426z@gawab.com> <200607250757.00643.a1426z@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: <200607250757.00643.a1426z@gawab.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1256; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al Boldi wrote: > Rejection of content should be based on technical merits only, and no process > guidelines should stay in the way of its preliminary acceptance. Otherwise, > we would be asking for a return to a bureaucratic system that inhibits > innovation, which I'm sure is not the intention of anybody, I hope. The most perfect filesystem in the world would be rejected, if it lacked a maintainer and/or is otherwise undebuggable or unmaintainable. Jeff