From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964870AbWGYVh1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:37:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964871AbWGYVh1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:37:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:1718 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964870AbWGYVh0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: <44C68F0E.2050100@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:37:18 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Organization: Red Hat, Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list References: <1153167857.31891.78.camel@lappy> <44C30E33.2090402@redhat.com> <44C518D6.3090606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Rik van Riel wrote: > >>> I think there may be a way with less changes to the way the VM functions to >>> get there: >> That approach probably has way too many state changes going >> between the guest OS and the hypervisor... > > An increment of a VM counter causes a state change in the hypervisor? Christoph, please read more than the first 5 words in each email before replying. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan