From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:15:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C69819.8080908@superbug.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060725203028.GA1270@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
> During the kernel summit, I was reminded by the wish by some people to
> do device probing in parallel, so I created the following patch. It
> offers up the ability for the driver core to create a new thread for
> every driver<->device probe call. To enable this, the driver needs to
> have the multithread_probe flag set to 1, otherwise the "traditional"
> sequencial probe happens.
>
> Note that this patch does not actually enable the threaded probe for any
> busses, as that's very dangerous at this point in time, without the
> different bus authors trying it out and verifying that it does work
> properly.
>
> I did enable this for both USB and PCI and shaved .4 seconds off of the
> boot time of my tiny little single processor laptop. The savings of my
> 4-way workstation is much greater, but things start to happen so fast we
> miss the root disk, as init starts before the disks are finished being
> initialized. I have some hacks to work around this right now, but I'll
> hold off on posting them before I make sure they work properly (breaking
> booting of people's machines isn't the best way to get them to accept
> new features...)
>
> Anyway, have fun playing around with this if you want, I'll be adding
> this to the next -mm, but you will have to enable the bit on your own if
> you want to see any speedups.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
What happens about the logging?
Surely one would want the output from one probe to be output into the
log as a block, and not mix the output from multiple simultaneous probes.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-25 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 20:30 [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing Greg KH
2006-07-25 21:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-07-25 21:27 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-25 22:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-26 7:28 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 22:15 ` James Courtier-Dutton [this message]
2006-07-26 0:08 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-26 7:27 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 7:24 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 22:57 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2006-07-26 7:22 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 0:34 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-26 7:31 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 11:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-26 16:16 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-26 16:46 ` Greg KH
2006-07-27 0:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-27 0:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C69819.8080908@superbug.co.uk \
--to=james@superbug.co.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox