From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750735AbWGZOOj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:14:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750734AbWGZOOj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:14:39 -0400 Received: from gateway.argo.co.il ([194.90.79.130]:32531 "EHLO argo2k.argo.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbWGZOOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:14:38 -0400 Message-ID: <44C778CA.1010404@argo.co.il> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:14:34 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: hch@infradead.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation. References: <20060726.031247.98341392.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20060726.031247.98341392.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2006 14:14:36.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[D33CEA10:01C6B0BD] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > > From: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:04:31 +0100 > > > And to be honest, I don't think adding all this code is acceptable > > if it can't replace the existing aio code while keeping the > > interface. So while you interface looks pretty sane the > > implementation needs a lot of work still :) > > Networking and disk AIO have significantly different needs. > Surely, there needs to be a unified polling interface to support single threaded designs. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function