From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932184AbWG2VQZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:16:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932191AbWG2VQZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:16:25 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:18141 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbWG2VQY (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:16:24 -0400 Message-ID: <44CBD387.601@tmr.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:30:47 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Building the kernel on an SMP box? References: <14CFC56C96D8554AA0B8969DB825FEA0012B3898@chicken.machinevisionproducts.com> <44CBB7F5.1080704@tmr.com> <200607292129.17682.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200607292129.17682.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: >>That sounds really useful, although I bet it assumes that the build >>environment is the same on all machines. Or at least similar. >> >> > >No it doesn't. > > > I will definitely have to look at that, then, I would have been very cautious about having the same version of the compiler and loader everywhere, but if the tasks are exported using the tool chain on the initiating computer or something, it should be all right. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979