From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com,
akpm@osdl.org, Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:46:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44CC0161.60806@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490607292317t405c906ek8b1577920eeace65@mail.gmail.com>
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
>
>> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite.
>> >
>> Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression
>> suite....
>>
> That's nice.
>
> Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out?
>
> Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode
> is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked
> against?" - can you comment on that?
>
>
Err, how about Zam handles all locking issues and this is Sunday with
the family? I know, lame, but he'll answer you on Monday Russian
time.....;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 22:16 possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5 Jesper Juhl
2006-07-25 23:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-07-29 22:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-29 23:08 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-30 6:17 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-30 0:46 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-07-30 10:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-31 19:34 ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-07-26 5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26 6:32 ` [patch] lockdep: annotate vfs_rmdir for filesystems that take i_mutex in delete_inode Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 6:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 6:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44CC0161.60806@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zam@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox