From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161323AbWHAHcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:32:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161337AbWHAHcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:32:18 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:57835 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161037AbWHAHcR (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:32:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UoXhm//4IJlSfRc3AZRAqXQSTOa8wiUWvZTFXQe4o9wkZW41aGUt/x8RAFtcUEzJGolPY5mIikCQlKCQeVAcxwUSll47EouNIzaTRyIivFJJ1/NIhuCg2gNJgYpHIM8zxVzXxIVP1bUoRLCfrTpAsAoCIxyXtm/5pc6I064ucwo= Message-ID: <44CF038B.50809@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:32:27 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060713) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jamagallon@ono.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [2.6.18-rc2-mm1] libata ate one PATA channel References: <20060728134550.030a0eb8@werewolf.auna.net> <44CD0E55.4020206@gmail.com> <20060731172452.76a1b6bd@werewolf.auna.net> <44CE2908.8080502@gmail.com> <1154363489.7230.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060731165011.GA6659@htj.dyndns.org> <20060731232243.65468eec.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060731232243.65468eec.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:50:11 +0900 > Tejun Heo wrote: > >>> It'll be easier just to work outside the -mm tree with all this >>> continued in/out random breakage if people are just going to say "drop >>> xyz patch" rather than actually specifying *what is actually wrong* and >>> getting me to fix the merge (Tejun that last one sentence is a hint ;)) >> Okay, took the hint. Magallon, can you please try the following >> patch? > > Gee that's a big scary patch. Is it considered ready for -mm? (bearing in > mind -mm's exacting quality standards (heh, I kill me)). > It's still a bit broken. I'll follow up with better patches later today (hopefully :) Thanks. -- tejun