From: "Dieter Stüken" <stueken@conterra.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3ware disk latency?
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:48:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D09125.1090901@conterra.de> (raw)
Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
>
> : my suspicion is the 3ware lacks any sort of "fairness" in its sharing of
> : buffer space between multiple units on the same controller. and by
> : disabling the write caching it limits the amount of controller memory that
> : the busy disk can consume.
>
> Hmm, do you have a battery backup unit for 9550sx? I don't,
> and the 3ware BIOS does not even allow me to enable write caching without it.
> So I don't think the write caching on the controller side is related
> to my problem.
>
> I have been able to improve the latency by upgrading the firmware
> to the newest release (wow, they even have a firmware updating utility
> for Linux!).
>
I just discovered this thread, as I have similar problems
with my 9550sx. I will perform a firmware upgrade tomorrow,
hope that helps. I have a BBU installed, thus my controller
should be able to handle concurrent requests for read and write.
But I also want to understand, what causes this problems. I have
several VMWare servers running on a RAID5 setup. Several times
a day I observe periods of excessive IO-waits and the guest systems
become unusable for a while. I may use "top", but all I see is
the high iowait and 4 idling processors. I not even found which
processes are actually waiting. Is there a way to trace,
which IO requests are pending, their block numbers and the
process ids that issued the requests? I found there are different
IO scheduler available, which have access to all these informations.
Is it possible to plug in some debug module to trace the IO
traffic similar to "strace" for processes?
Dieter.
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-02 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-02 11:48 Dieter Stüken [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-10 14:13 3ware disk latency? Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-26 16:52 ` dean gaudet
2006-07-26 20:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-26 21:53 ` dean gaudet
2006-07-26 22:07 ` adam radford
2006-07-26 22:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-26 22:48 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-07-26 22:20 ` adam radford
2006-07-27 3:00 ` dean gaudet
2006-07-27 13:42 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-27 12:11 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-27 18:30 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D09125.1090901@conterra.de \
--to=stueken@conterra.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox