From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
greg@kroah.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Jack Lo <jlo@vmware.com>,
Sahil Rihan <srihan@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: A proposal - binary
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:42:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D7DDEF.6070907@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060808001255.GQ2759@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, I guess we'd like VMI to be buildable in normal kernel build
> tools ... and at that point, open sourcing it should be _really_ easy.
>
> And we'd prefer legal decisions not to influence technical ones. Maybe
> we will decide to use binary interface after all, but seeing GPLed,
> easily-buildable interface, first, means we can look at both solutions
> and decide which one is better.
I don't think you're actually arguing for the VMI ROM to be built into
the kernel. But since this could be a valid interpretation of what you
said, let me address that point so other readers of this thread don't
misinterpret.
On a purely technical level, the VMI layer must not be part of the
normal kernel build. It must be distributed by the hypervisor to which
it communicates. This is what provides hypervisor independence and
hardware compatibility, and why it can't be distributed with the
kernel. The kernel interfaces for VMI that are part of the kernel
proper are already completely open sourced and GPL'd. The piece in
question is the hypervisor specific VMI layer, which we have not yet
released an open source distribution of.
We do use standard tools for building it, for the most part - although
some perl scripting and elf munging magic is part of the build.
Finally, since it is a ROM, we have to use a post-build tool to convert
the extracted object to a ROM image and fix up the checksum. We don't
have a problem including any of those tools in an open source
distribution of the VMI ESX ROM once we finish sorting through the
license issues. We've already fixed most of the problems we had with
entangled header files so that we can create a buildable tarball that
requires only standard GNU compilers, elf tools, and perl to run. I
believe the only technical issue left is fixing the makefiles so that
building it doesn't require our rather complicated make system.
Hopefully we can have all this resolved soon so that you can build and
distribute your own ROM images, see how the code operates, and use the
base design framework as a blueprint for porting to other hypervisor
implementations, porting other operating systems, or just as a general
experimental layer that could be used for debugging or performance
instrumentation.
Zach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-08 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 10:14 A proposal - binary Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 11:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-03 12:16 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-08-03 15:17 ` Rik van Riel
2006-08-03 16:05 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-03 17:57 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 18:29 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-08-03 18:47 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 18:08 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 19:03 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 19:14 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 19:36 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 19:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-03 19:59 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 20:25 ` Options depending on STANDALONE Adrian Bunk
2006-08-03 20:28 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 20:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-03 23:40 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Trent Piepho
2006-08-05 10:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-06 11:18 ` Oliver Endriss
2006-08-13 16:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-14 21:15 ` Trent Piepho
2006-08-27 21:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-03 19:48 ` A proposal - binary linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-08-04 6:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-03 21:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-03 13:21 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-03 20:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-03 21:12 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-03 21:27 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 15:35 ` Rik van Riel
2006-08-03 18:36 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-05 10:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-06 22:45 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-06 22:59 ` Greg KH
2006-08-08 0:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 0:42 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2006-08-09 7:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-03 19:06 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 19:26 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 20:01 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 21:41 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-03 22:30 ` Greg KH
2006-08-03 22:49 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 22:31 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-03 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-03 23:40 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-04 10:21 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 14:34 ` Theodore Tso
2006-08-05 0:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-04 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-04 2:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-04 4:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 5:04 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-04 5:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 7:04 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-04 7:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 8:29 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-04 16:57 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 18:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-04 18:46 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-08-04 19:06 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 19:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-04 19:45 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 20:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-04 20:31 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 21:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-04 21:40 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-08-04 22:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-04 22:45 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 19:45 ` Jeff Dike
2006-08-04 19:49 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 21:46 ` Jeff Dike
2006-08-04 22:40 ` David Lang
2006-08-04 5:40 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-04 6:28 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-08-04 7:01 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-04 7:19 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-08-04 7:37 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-04 18:34 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-04 20:41 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-04 20:52 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-04 21:26 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-05 1:14 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-05 5:37 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-05 10:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-05 11:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 22:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-04 22:39 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-04 22:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-04 22:43 ` David Lang
2006-08-05 10:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-05 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-05 1:30 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-05 4:33 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D7DDEF.6070907@vmware.com \
--to=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlo@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=srihan@vmware.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox