From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unserialized task->files changing
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:43:38 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D86ADA.5000904@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608081223.10434.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:07:49PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>>
>>>Fixed race on put_files_struct on exec with proc.
>>>Restoring files on current on error path may lead
>>>to proc having a pointer to already kfree-d files_struct.
>>
>>This is three times the exact same code sequence, it should probably go
>>into a helper:
>>
>>void reset_current_files(struct files_struct *files)
>>{
>> struct files_struct *old = current->files;
>>
>> task_lock(current);
>> current->files = files;
>> task_unlock(current);
>> put_files_struct(old);
>>}
>
>
>
> More over I think you want to task_lock() before reading current->files
> into 'old'
>
> task_lock(current);
> old = current->files;
> current->files = files;
> task_unlock(current);
> put_files_struct(old);
>
> or maybe a xchg() ?
yeah, never do assignments in declarations :)
BTW, not sure about kthread_exit_files() yet, but looks like it suffers too.
unshare_files() changes current->files w/o locking as well. but I can't see
where it puts the old files... hmm...
Kirill
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-08 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-08 10:07 [PATCH] unserialized task->files changing Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-08 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-08-08 10:43 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D86ADA.5000904@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox