From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2)
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:08:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D9D03B.6060907@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060809143816.GA142@oleg>
>>Although I'm not sure it's needed for this problem. A getppid() which does
>>
>>asmlinkage long sys_getppid(void)
>>{
>> int pid;
>>
>> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>> pid = current->group_leader->real_parent->tgid;
>> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>>
>> return pid;
>>}
>>
>>seems like a fine implementation to me ;)
>
>
> Why do we need to use ->group_leader? All threads should have the same
> ->real_parent.
I'm not sure this is true for old LinuxThreads...
> Why do we need tasklist_lock? I think rcu_read_lock() is enough.
>
> In other words, do you see any problems with this code
>
> smlinkage long sys_getppid(void)
> {
> int pid;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> pid = rcu_dereference(current->real_parent)->tgid;
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return pid;
> }
>
> ? Yes, we may read a stale value for ->real_parent, but the memory
> can't be freed while we are under rcu_read_lock(). And in this case
> the returned value is ok because the task could be reparented just
> after return anyway.
Your patch doesn't cure the problem.
rcu_read_lock just disables preemtion and rcu_dereference
introduces memory barrier. _None_ of this _prevents_
another CPU from freeing old real_parent in parallel with your dereference.
You can minimize the probability very much by making local_irq_disable()/enable()
around the code in question, but still it won't be a real fix (at least due to NMIs).
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-09 14:38 [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2) Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-09 12:08 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-08-09 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-09 13:02 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-09 18:24 ` [PATCH] sys_getppid-oopses-on-debug-kernel-v2-simplify Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-08 15:50 [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 16:09 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D9D03B.6060907@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox