From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2)
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:02:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D9DCFF.2080400@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060809165441.GA187@oleg>
>>Your patch doesn't cure the problem.
>>rcu_read_lock just disables preemtion and rcu_dereference
>>introduces memory barrier. _None_ of this _prevents_
>>another CPU from freeing old real_parent in parallel with your dereference.
>
>
> How so? Note that release_task() doesn't call put_task_struct(), it does
> call_rcu(&p->rcu, delayed_put_task_struct) instead. When delayed_put_task_struct()
> is called, all CPUs must see the new value of ->real_parent (otherwise
> RCU is just broken). If CPU sees the old value of ->real_parent, rcu_read_lock()
> protects us from delayed_put_task_struct() on another CPU.
>
> Ok, I think this is the same "classic" pattern as:
>
> old = global_ptr;
> global_ptr = new;
> call_rcu(..free_old...);
> vs
> rcu_read_lock();
> use(global_ptr);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> Do you agree?
Agree :)
Sorry, I didn't notice that task structs are freed now with RCU :)))
In this case your patch really helps the problem. Care to prepare it?
Thanks,
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-09 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-09 14:38 [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2) Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-09 12:08 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-09 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-08-09 13:02 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-08-09 18:24 ` [PATCH] sys_getppid-oopses-on-debug-kernel-v2-simplify Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-08 15:50 [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel (v2) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 16:09 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D9DCFF.2080400@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox