From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq stops working after a while
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:01:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DCE213.8090508@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44DCDD50.4020804@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>>
>> boot with cpufreq.debug=7, and capture dmesg output after it fails
>> to transition. This might be another manifestation of the mysterious
>> "highest frequency isnt accessable" bug, that seems to come from
>> some recent change in acpi.
>
> booting with that option doesn't seem to give me any new messages
> in dmesg (or /var/log/messages). I also tried editing cpufreq.c
> and hardcoding debug = 7 on the variable declaration.
> Still no new messages.
Mmm.. that's interesting.. this time, the scaling_max_freq went back up
to 1100000 all by itself after a longish idle period, before which it had
dropped to 800000 and got "stuck" there.
Currently using the "ondemand" governor -- it doesn't seem to call the
central cpufreq_debug_printk() thingie from cpufreq.c.
I did hack cpufreq_debug_printk() to force output anytime it gets called,
but still no new output in the logs.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-11 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-11 18:25 cpufreq stops working after a while Mark Lord
2006-08-11 18:39 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-11 19:41 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 20:01 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-08-11 20:12 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-11 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-11 19:01 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 19:10 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-11 19:55 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-11 20:29 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 20:39 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 21:01 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-11 21:09 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 21:15 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 21:17 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 21:25 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-18 15:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 14:44 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-24 16:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-08-11 21:08 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-11 21:38 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-11 21:53 ` Mark Lord
2006-08-11 22:18 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DCE213.8090508@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox