From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:10:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E5BC2C.80708@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608181605.19520.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config
>> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is
>> self-compiling..
>
> Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector
> enabled.
>
oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that
looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step..
can you show me the compile error you got or the bug you found?
Also, I generally like this order since this order allows you to bisect stackprotector patches itself, rather than the
artificial "add a bunch of dead code and then suddenly turn the light on" approach..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 16:48 [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2) Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:49 ` [patch 1/5] -fstack-protector feature: annotate the PDA offsets Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:50 ` [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 18:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-18 11:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 11:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 14:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 13:10 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-08-18 13:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 17:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-16 16:51 ` [patch 3/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the canary field to the PDA area Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:52 ` [patch 4/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the __stack_chk_fail() function Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:53 ` [patch 5/5] -fstack-protector feature: Enable the compiler flags in CFLAGS Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 18:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-16 19:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 11:15 ` [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2) Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 11:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E5BC2C.80708@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox