Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel

Tejun Heo
2006-08-15T13:35:49Z

Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:07 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> And libata already has sufficient ioctl compatibility for nearly all
>> purposes with the old drivers/ide stuff. Yes, there are some more
>> esoteric ioctls that I once implemented in drivers/ide that do not
>> exist for libata, and nobody will miss them.
> IRRC, there nothing for ATAPI ioctl compatibility, there only things for
> ATA.

What do you mean by ATAPI ioctl - TASK or TASKFILE ioctl or something else?

--
tejun