Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)

Dave Hansen
2006-08-17T17:53:18Z

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:36 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict,
> > and very straightforward.
>
> What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have
> the required information.

I think _I_ was being too ambiguous. ;)

When you uniquely assign a kernel object, say mapping->container, there
is no ambiguity.

-- Dave