From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932300AbWHVPOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:14:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932312AbWHVPOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:14:05 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:10160 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932300AbWHVPOC (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:14:02 -0400 Message-ID: <44EB1F37.6030902@goop.org> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:13:59 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Ian Campbell , Andrew Morton , Ian Pratt , Xen-devel , Chris Wright , Virtualization , Christoph Lameter , Linux Kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] x86_64: Put .note.* sections into a PT_NOTE segment in vmlinux II References: <1156256777.5091.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200608221659.18896.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200608221659.18896.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > Sorry I tried to apply it, but at least 2.6.18rc4 mainline (which my tree > is based on) doesn't have a NOTES macro so it doesn't link > > I dropped the NOTES addition for now, presumably it will need to be readded > later. Yes, Ian's patch is incremental on top of mine, which defines the NOTES macro in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h: #define NOTES \ .notes : { *(.note.*) } :note J