From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964980AbWHWPXd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:23:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964979AbWHWPXd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:23:33 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:63948 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964977AbWHWPXc (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:23:32 -0400 Message-ID: <44EC72F3.70505@goop.org> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:23:31 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Campbell CC: Andrew Morton , Virtualization , Linux Kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Translate asm version of ELFNOTE macro into preprocessor macro References: <1156333761.12949.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44EC6B12.4060909@goop.org> <1156346074.12949.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1156346074.12949.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Campbell wrote: >> OK, seems reasonable. Eric Biederman solved this by having NOTE/ENDNOTE >> (or something like that) in his "bzImage with ELF header" patch, but I >> don't remember it being used in any way which is incompatible with using >> a CPP macro. >> > > I can't find that patch, does NOTE/ENDNOTE just do the push/pop .note > section? > > That would solve the problem with the first argument of the macro being > a string but the final argument could still be for .asciz note contents. > It looks like: .macro note name, type .balign 4 .int 2f - 1f # n_namesz .int 4f - 3f # n_descsz .int \type # n_type .balign 4 1: .asciz "\name" 2: .balign 4 3: .endm .macro enote 4: .balign 4 .endm so it allows you to put arbitrary stuff in the desc part of the note. The downside is that its a little more cumbersome syntactically for the common case. J