public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, okuji@enbug.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] fail-injection capability for disk IO
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:22:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44EC9CE7.3080406@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060823102741.b927e092.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:03:55 +0200
> Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Wed, Aug 23 2006, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>     
>>> This patch provides fail-injection capability for disk IO.
>>>
>>> Boot option:
>>>
>>> 	fail_make_request=<probability>,<interval>,<times>,<space>
>>>
>>> 	<probability>
>>>
>>> 		specifies how often it should fail in percent.
>>>
>>> 	<interval>
>>>
>>> 		specifies the interval of failures.
>>>
>>> 	<times>
>>>
>>> 		specifies how many times failures may happen at most.
>>>
>>> 	<space>
>>>
>>> 		specifies the size of free space where disk IO can be issued
>>> 		safely in bytes.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> 	fail_make_request=100,10,-1,0
>>>
>>> generic_make_request() fails once per 10 times.
>>>       
>> Hmm dunno, seems a pretty useless feature to me.
>>     
>
> We need it.  What is the FS/VFS/VM behaviour in the presence of IO
> errors?  Nobody knows, because we rarely test it.  Those few times where
> people _do_ test it (the hard way), bad things tend to happen.  reiserfs
> (for example) likes to go wobble, wobble, wobble, BUG.
>   
The iron folks tested it, and we did better than other FS's.  That said,
it seems like a valuable feature to me.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-23 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-23 11:32 [patch 0/5] RFC: fault-injection capabilities Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 1/5] fail-injection library Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:09   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 2/5] fail-injection capability for kmalloc Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 3/5] fail-injection capability for alloc_pages() Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 4/5] fail-injection capability for disk IO Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:03   ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 17:27     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-23 18:01       ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 18:16         ` Ric Wheeler
2006-08-23 18:26           ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 18:22       ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-08-23 12:07   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 12:10     ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 19:34       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-08-23 19:42         ` Ric Wheeler
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 5/5] debugfs entries for configuration Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:06 ` [patch 0/5] RFC: fault-injection capabilities Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 14:18 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-08-24 18:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44EC9CE7.3080406@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mita@miraclelinux.com \
    --cc=okuji@enbug.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox