public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
To: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] fail-injection capability for disk IO
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:42:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44ECAFB4.8060206@emc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eciajs$1ip$1@sea.gmane.org>

Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, Aug 23 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>>I think I would prefer a stackable driver instead of this hook.
> 
> 
> I second this, preferrably a device-mapper target similar to dm-error.
> 
> 
>>But that makes it more tricky to setup a test, since you have to change
>>from using /dev/sda (for example) to /dev/stacked-driver.
> 
> 
> Do you really think somebody would run such tests on otherwise normally
> used devices?
> 

We certainly run this kind of tests on a routine basis - before we ship 
a kernel to our installed field, we need to verify that it will handle 
disk IO errors correctly.

In our case, the tests are run on a farm of machines that get pxe'ed to 
a specific image, tested (usually by sticking in a disk known to be bad 
enough to cause reliable errors ;-)) and then we watch to see that the 
errors do not cause hangs, etc.

Having a requirement to change our standard image (sda -> 
stacked-driver) would not be impossible, but would be less convenient...

ric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-23 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-23 11:32 [patch 0/5] RFC: fault-injection capabilities Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 1/5] fail-injection library Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:09   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 2/5] fail-injection capability for kmalloc Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 3/5] fail-injection capability for alloc_pages() Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 4/5] fail-injection capability for disk IO Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:03   ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 17:27     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-23 18:01       ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 18:16         ` Ric Wheeler
2006-08-23 18:26           ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 18:22       ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-23 12:07   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 12:10     ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-23 19:34       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-08-23 19:42         ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
2006-08-23 11:32 ` [patch 5/5] debugfs entries for configuration Akinobu Mita
2006-08-23 12:06 ` [patch 0/5] RFC: fault-injection capabilities Andi Kleen
2006-08-23 14:18 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-08-24 18:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44ECAFB4.8060206@emc.com \
    --to=ric@emc.com \
    --cc=Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox