From: Edward Falk <efalk@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:57:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44ED157D.6050607@google.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]
Add spin_lock_string_flags and _raw_spin_lock_flags() to
asm-x86_64/spinlock.h so that _spin_lock_irqsave() has the same
semantics on x86_64 as it does on i386 and does *not* have interrupts
disabled while it is waiting for the lock.
This fix is courtesy of Michael Davidson
[-- Attachment #2: 2012926.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1665 bytes --]
Change 2012926 by md@md-test on 2006/01/23 18:28:12
Add spin_lock_string_flags and _raw_spin_lock_flags() to
asm-x86_64/spinlock.h so that _spin_lock_irqsave() has the
same semantics on x86_64 as it does on i386 and does *not*
have interrupts disabled while it is waiting for the lock.
PRESUBMIT=passed
R=mbligh mikew
OCL=2010261
diff -uprN linux-2.6.17/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2012926/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h
--- linux-2.6.17/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2006-06-17 18:49:35.000000000 -0700
+++ 2012926/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2006-07-12 16:09:50.000000000 -0700
@@ -32,6 +32,23 @@
"jmp 1b\n" \
LOCK_SECTION_END
+#define __raw_spin_lock_string_flags \
+ "\n1:\t" \
+ "lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
+ "js 2f\n\t" \
+ LOCK_SECTION_START("") \
+ "2:\t" \
+ "test $0x200, %1\n\t" \
+ "jz 3f\n\t" \
+ "sti\n\t" \
+ "3:\t" \
+ "rep;nop\n\t" \
+ "cmpb $0, %0\n\t" \
+ "jle 3b\n\t" \
+ "cli\n\t" \
+ "jmp 1b\n" \
+ LOCK_SECTION_END
+
#define __raw_spin_unlock_string \
"movl $1,%0" \
:"=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"
@@ -43,8 +60,6 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_s
:"=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
}
-#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
-
static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
int oldval;
@@ -57,6 +72,13 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw
return oldval > 0;
}
+static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ __raw_spin_lock_string_flags
+ :"=m" (lock->slock) : "r" (flags) : "memory");
+}
+
static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
__asm__ __volatile__(
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 2:57 Edward Falk [this message]
2006-08-24 3:10 ` [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave() Nick Piggin
2006-08-24 4:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-24 15:53 ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-26 7:52 ` Keith Owens
2006-08-24 6:45 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-24 11:04 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-08-24 11:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 11:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-24 12:33 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-08-24 13:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 13:44 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-08-25 4:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-25 5:33 ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-25 6:21 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44ED157D.6050607@google.com \
--to=efalk@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox