public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Ben Collins <bcollins@ubuntu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 1/5] ieee1394: sbp2: workaround for write protect bit of Initio firmware
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:19:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F244B7.1070408@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608271308360.27779@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't think there really is _ever_ any reason to use the 10-byte version 
> if the 6-byte version is expected to work. Is there?

Yes, but not really important:  10-byte allows a 16-bit allocation 
length (additional data section), where 6-byte only allows 8-bit.

However, the mode pages the kernel requests from the device are normally 
<= 256 bytes.

In general, your intuition is correct.  use_10_for_foo is largely meant 
for the subclass of "SCSI" devices which often don't bother to implement 
the 6-byte commands, forcing the software driver to emulate 6-byte. 
use_10_for_foo allows the software driver to eliminate that in-kernel 
emulation code.

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-28  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-27 11:25 [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 0/5] drivers/ieee1394/sbp2: fixes for 2.6.18-rc Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:26 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 1/5] ieee1394: sbp2: workaround for write protect bit of Initio firmware Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 20:17   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-28  1:19     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-08-28  9:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-28 11:44       ` Stefan Richter
     [not found]         ` <44FC8AAC.10609@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2006-09-04 20:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-04 21:26             ` Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:27 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 2/5] ieee1394: sbp2: safer agent reset in error handlers Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:28 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 3/5] ieee1394: sbp2: safer last_orb and next_ORB handling Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 4/5] ieee1394: sbp2: discard return value of sbp2_link_orb_command Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:31 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 5/5] ieee1394: sbp2: handle "sbp2util_node_write_no_wait failed" Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:34 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 3/5] ieee1394: sbp2: safer last_orb and next_ORB handling Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:34 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 4/5] ieee1394: sbp2: discard return value of sbp2_link_orb_command Stefan Richter
2006-08-27 11:35 ` [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 5/5] ieee1394: sbp2: handle "sbp2util_node_write_no_wait failed" Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44F244B7.1070408@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox