From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932095AbWHaLty (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:49:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932100AbWHaLty (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:49:54 -0400 Received: from corky.net ([212.150.53.130]:33714 "EHLO zebday.corky.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932095AbWHaLty (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:49:54 -0400 Message-ID: <44F6CCC7.6090606@corky.net> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:49:27 +0100 From: Just Marc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: dspam as an incoming message filter on LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on CorKy.NeT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm sure many of you have experience with lots of different of spam filters, at least some of you will know how good and effective DSPAM is. What I propose is simple, after we teach DSPAM what is ham and what is spam (a quick process on LKML) have one person who will volunteer to weed out any false positives (if any) for a short period of time, following that we can just let DSPAM do its magic and enjoy a totally spam free LKML. The chance of false positives with the kind of highly specific topics and keywords discussed on LKML is extremely small. Comments? Marc