From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750883AbWIADIQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:08:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750889AbWIADIP (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:08:15 -0400 Received: from flpvm09.prodigy.net ([207.115.20.39]:8407 "EHLO flpvm09.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbWIADIP (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:08:15 -0400 X-ORBL: [68.95.116.149] Message-ID: <44F7A404.1070502@ksu.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:07:48 -0500 From: "Scott J. Harmon" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Chris Wedgwood , vsu@altlinux.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: acpi gets wrong interrupt for via sata in 2.6.16.17 References: <449DE6BA.2050206@ksu.edu> <20060625132457.4b0922b4.vsu@altlinux.ru> <44A1C78C.4090401@ksu.edu> <44ADAB1F.6040208@ksu.edu> <20060706181453.3ce5a1c5.akpm@osdl.org> <20060707034735.GA12908@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20060706205509.4e4ae2ee.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060706205509.4e4ae2ee.akpm@osdl.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is _still_ a problem with 2.6.17.11 Thanks, Scott. Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:47:35 -0700 > Chris Wedgwood wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:14:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> I have both reversion patches queued up but haven't heard from >>> anyone about anything. >> i saw that --- i don't think it's right, but it's not more wrong than >> having that merged as-is in the first place which i'll argue is wrong >> by virtue of the fact we run the quirk everywhere and apparently break >> things >> >>> I don't know if anyone's working on this bug. >> it's not forgotten, i'm waiting to hear back from people still. >> enabling ACPI *should* suffice, but for some people clearly it doesn't >> (there are claims VIA got their ACPI wrong so this might explain why >> it works for some people and not others) >> >>> Thursday is my subsystem-maintainer-spamming day, so the reverts >>> will be heading Gregwards today. >> like i said, i really don't think reverting the patches is technically >> correct, but given that i don't have adequate hardware to test against >> it might be the least painful option right now > > Yes, it's a question of whose machines we choose to break. > > It'd be great to get this thing nailed. Do the people who are out testing > things need re-asking? > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes." - Edsger Dijkstra