From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: msleep_interruptible vs msleep
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:29:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FC7EAE.6020300@free.fr> (raw)
Hi,
What's the difference between msleep_interruptible and msleep ?
If I understand correctly the main difference between msleep and
msleep_interruptible is that msleep_interruptible can return if there is
a pending signal ?
But why if I have a kernel thread that do [1] :
while (true) {
Do some stuff
msleep(1000)
}
the load average is high (near 100%).
and if I use msleep_interruptible the load average is normal.
Does the same applies to wait_event_timeout vs
wait_event_interruptible_timeout ?
Thanks,
Matthieu CASTET
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-04 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-04 19:29 matthieu castet [this message]
2006-09-04 19:38 ` msleep_interruptible vs msleep Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FC7EAE.6020300@free.fr \
--to=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox