From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:27:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FDF9BC.1000403@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157490479.28193.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the
>> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they?
>
> they should be yes
> (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined
> into)
Was there function inlining performed? E.g. on those functions that are
called from only one place?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =--= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-05 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-05 17:37 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2006-09-05 18:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-05 18:16 ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 19:03 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 19:19 ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 19:51 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 19:23 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 21:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-05 22:27 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2006-09-06 0:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-06 7:13 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 16:50 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 17:04 ` [RFT PATCH 1/2] ieee1394: nodemgr: fix rwsem recursion Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 17:06 ` [RFT PATCH 2/2] ieee1394: nodemgr: grab class.subsys.rwsem in nodemgr_resume_ne Stefan Richter
2006-09-07 22:45 ` 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2006-09-07 23:23 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 22:35 ` Greg KH
2006-09-05 19:49 ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 20:19 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 20:26 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-06 6:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FDF9BC.1000403@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox