From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wim@iguana.be
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FEAD7E.6010201@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fyf5jnkj.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>
Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Winbond W83697HG watchdog timer
Looks good, thanks.
I've got a W83697H*F* here on a VIA motherboard,
which is the same from a watchdog point of view.
It is on port 0x2e though.
Is 0x4e a good default?
Is W83697HG a good name?
Note I've CC'd Wim Van Sebroeck who is the watchdog tree maintainer.
I noticed you didn't include the check that's in the
W83627HF driver to reset the timeout if already running
from the BIOS. This was because some BIOS set the timeout
to 4 minutes for example, so when the driver was loaded
and reset the mode to seconds, the machine rebooted
before the init scripts could run and start the userspace
watchdog daemon.
cheers,
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-06 10:29 [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 11:14 ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2006-09-06 11:29 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 11:49 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-06 12:07 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 12:48 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-06 19:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-07 9:57 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-07 13:24 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-07 16:44 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-08 9:16 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-08 9:49 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-07 17:26 ` Jim Cromie
2006-09-07 18:06 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-08 12:22 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-09 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 15:18 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 15:33 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 15:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 15:38 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 16:28 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 21:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 22:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 22:27 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 18:02 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-09-09 18:35 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-11 5:50 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-09-13 19:15 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-14 7:15 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-14 7:05 ` [RFC-patch 0/3] SuperIO locks coordinator (was: watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip) Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 7:13 ` [RFC-patch 1/3] SuperIO locks coordinator Jim Cromie
2006-09-17 17:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-09-14 7:16 ` [RFC-patch 2/3] " Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 7:20 ` [RFC-patch 3/3] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in pc8736x_gpio Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 21:58 ` [RFC-patch 0/3] SuperIO locks coordinator Jim Cromie
[not found] ` <4dfa50520609141753h34e54fdayba62f1b127d58036@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <450A54EB.1020305@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4dfa50520609151118s65a980b4td143a9fbbfeb1798@mail.gmail.com>
2006-09-16 17:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Jim Cromie
2006-09-19 13:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FEAD7E.6010201@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@rfc1149.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox