public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"sagis@google.com" <sagis@google.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"dmatlack@google.com" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	"isaku.yamahata@gmail.com" <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect building mirror page tables
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:52:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44fed65b5b7f180e912f265209269a0a2b2f8846.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfYhKmBkqGP-d12o6W2TfiaqwP-c8pcae9-pnkaYJt6K-w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 12:10 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:07 PM Rick Edgecombe
> <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> wrote:
> > +       /* Update mirrored mapping with page table link */
> > +       int (*reflect_link_spt)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > +                               void *mirrored_spt);
> > +       /* Update the mirrored page table from spte getting set */
> > +       int (*reflect_set_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > +                               kvm_pfn_t pfn);
> 
> Possibly link_external_spt and set_external_spte, since you'll have to
> s/mirrored/external/ in the comment. But not a hard request.

Definitely seems better now that we have the "external" nomenclature.

> 
> > +static void *get_mirrored_spt(gfn_t gfn, u64 new_spte, int level)
> > +{
> > +       if (is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte) && !is_last_spte(new_spte,
> > level)) {
> > +               struct kvm_mmu_page *sp =
> > to_shadow_page(pfn_to_hpa(spte_to_pfn(new_spte)));
> 
> I think this is spte_to_child_sp(new_spte)?

Yes, that seems much easier than all this.


[snip]

> 
> > +static int __must_check reflect_set_spte_present(struct kvm *kvm,
> > tdp_ptep_t sptep,
> 
> tdp_mmu_set_mirror_spte_atomic?
> 
> > +       /*
> > +        * For mirrored page table, callbacks are needed to propagate SPTE
> > +        * change into the mirrored page table. In order to atomically
> > update
> > +        * both the SPTE and the mirrored page tables with callbacks,
> > utilize
> > +        * freezing SPTE.
> > +        * - Freeze the SPTE. Set entry to REMOVED_SPTE.
> > +        * - Trigger callbacks for mirrored page tables.
> > +        * - Unfreeze the SPTE.  Set the entry to new_spte.
> > +        */
> 
> /*
>  * We need to lock out other updates to the SPTE until the external
>  * page table has been modified. Use REMOVED_SPTE similar to
>  * the zapping case.
>  */
> 
> Easy peasy. :) We may want to rename REMOVED_SPTE to FROZEN_SPTE; feel
> free to do it at the head of this series, then it can be picked for
> 6.11.

Ok.

> 
> > -static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64
> > new_spte)
> > +static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> > tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
> >  {
> >         u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
> > 
> > @@ -571,15 +629,36 @@ static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct
> > tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
> >          */
> >         WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded || is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
> > 
> > -       /*
> > -        * Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
> > -        * does not hold the mmu_lock.  On failure, i.e. if a different
> > logical
> > -        * CPU modified the SPTE, try_cmpxchg64() updates iter->old_spte
> > with
> > -        * the current value, so the caller operates on fresh data, e.g. if
> > it
> > -        * retries tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic()
> > -        */
> > -       if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
> > -               return -EBUSY;
> > +       if (is_mirror_sptep(iter->sptep) && !is_removed_spte(new_spte)) {
> > +               int ret;
> > +
> > +               /* Don't support atomic zapping for mirrored roots */
> 
> The why is hidden in the commit message to patch 11. I wonder if it
> isn't clearer to simply squash together patches 10 and 11 (your call),
> and instead split out the addition of the new struct kvm parameters.

I actually split them in two for this v2. I thought the combined patch was too
big. Maybe I could just move this whole hunk to the next patch. I'll give it a
try.

> 
> Anyway, this comment needs a bit more info:
> 
> /*
>  * Users of atomic zapping don't operate on mirror roots,
>  * so only need to handle present new_spte.
>  */

Ok.

> 
> > +               if (KVM_BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte), kvm))
> > +                       return -EBUSY;
> > +               /*
> > +                * Populating case.
> > +                * - reflect_set_spte_present() implements
> > +                *   1) Freeze SPTE
> > +                *   2) call hooks to update mirrored page table,
> > +                *   3) update SPTE to new_spte
> > +                * - handle_changed_spte() only updates stats.
> > +                */
> 
> Comment not needed (weird I know).

Sure.




  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-07 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-30 21:06 [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU prep series part 1 Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: Add member to struct kvm_gfn_range for target alias Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 15:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:06     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Add a VM type define for TDX Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a mirrored pointer to struct kvm_mmu_page Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:12     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a new mirror_pt member for union kvm_mmu_page_role Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:15     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_tdp_mmu_alloc_root() return void Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Support GFN direct mask Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07  7:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 18:39     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08  8:52       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-08  9:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-09 23:25         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-07  8:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Extract root invalid check from tdx_mmu_next_root() Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Introduce KVM MMU root types to specify page table type Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07  8:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:06     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support mirror root for TDP MMU Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:57   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-07  8:27     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07  8:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:27     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08  9:13       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10  0:08         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-10  9:23           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10 16:00             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect building mirror page tables Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 10:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:52     ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect tearing down " Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 11:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 21:46     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08  9:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-12 18:39       ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-06-14 23:11         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Take root types for kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Make mmu notifier callbacks to check kvm_process Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07  8:56   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:12     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08  9:15       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10  1:06         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Invalidate correct roots Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07  9:03   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:31     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Add a helper function to walk down the TDP MMU Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07  9:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 23:39     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08  9:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-12 18:56       ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-06-07 11:39 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU prep series part 1 Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:54   ` Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44fed65b5b7f180e912f265209269a0a2b2f8846.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox