From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"sagis@google.com" <sagis@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"dmatlack@google.com" <dmatlack@google.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@gmail.com" <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect building mirror page tables
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:52:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44fed65b5b7f180e912f265209269a0a2b2f8846.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfYhKmBkqGP-d12o6W2TfiaqwP-c8pcae9-pnkaYJt6K-w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 12:10 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:07 PM Rick Edgecombe
> <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> wrote:
> > + /* Update mirrored mapping with page table link */
> > + int (*reflect_link_spt)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > + void *mirrored_spt);
> > + /* Update the mirrored page table from spte getting set */
> > + int (*reflect_set_spte)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level
> > level,
> > + kvm_pfn_t pfn);
>
> Possibly link_external_spt and set_external_spte, since you'll have to
> s/mirrored/external/ in the comment. But not a hard request.
Definitely seems better now that we have the "external" nomenclature.
>
> > +static void *get_mirrored_spt(gfn_t gfn, u64 new_spte, int level)
> > +{
> > + if (is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte) && !is_last_spte(new_spte,
> > level)) {
> > + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp =
> > to_shadow_page(pfn_to_hpa(spte_to_pfn(new_spte)));
>
> I think this is spte_to_child_sp(new_spte)?
Yes, that seems much easier than all this.
[snip]
>
> > +static int __must_check reflect_set_spte_present(struct kvm *kvm,
> > tdp_ptep_t sptep,
>
> tdp_mmu_set_mirror_spte_atomic?
>
> > + /*
> > + * For mirrored page table, callbacks are needed to propagate SPTE
> > + * change into the mirrored page table. In order to atomically
> > update
> > + * both the SPTE and the mirrored page tables with callbacks,
> > utilize
> > + * freezing SPTE.
> > + * - Freeze the SPTE. Set entry to REMOVED_SPTE.
> > + * - Trigger callbacks for mirrored page tables.
> > + * - Unfreeze the SPTE. Set the entry to new_spte.
> > + */
>
> /*
> * We need to lock out other updates to the SPTE until the external
> * page table has been modified. Use REMOVED_SPTE similar to
> * the zapping case.
> */
>
> Easy peasy. :) We may want to rename REMOVED_SPTE to FROZEN_SPTE; feel
> free to do it at the head of this series, then it can be picked for
> 6.11.
Ok.
>
> > -static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64
> > new_spte)
> > +static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> > tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
> > {
> > u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
> >
> > @@ -571,15 +629,36 @@ static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct
> > tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
> > */
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded || is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
> > - * does not hold the mmu_lock. On failure, i.e. if a different
> > logical
> > - * CPU modified the SPTE, try_cmpxchg64() updates iter->old_spte
> > with
> > - * the current value, so the caller operates on fresh data, e.g. if
> > it
> > - * retries tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic()
> > - */
> > - if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + if (is_mirror_sptep(iter->sptep) && !is_removed_spte(new_spte)) {
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Don't support atomic zapping for mirrored roots */
>
> The why is hidden in the commit message to patch 11. I wonder if it
> isn't clearer to simply squash together patches 10 and 11 (your call),
> and instead split out the addition of the new struct kvm parameters.
I actually split them in two for this v2. I thought the combined patch was too
big. Maybe I could just move this whole hunk to the next patch. I'll give it a
try.
>
> Anyway, this comment needs a bit more info:
>
> /*
> * Users of atomic zapping don't operate on mirror roots,
> * so only need to handle present new_spte.
> */
Ok.
>
> > + if (KVM_BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte), kvm))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + /*
> > + * Populating case.
> > + * - reflect_set_spte_present() implements
> > + * 1) Freeze SPTE
> > + * 2) call hooks to update mirrored page table,
> > + * 3) update SPTE to new_spte
> > + * - handle_changed_spte() only updates stats.
> > + */
>
> Comment not needed (weird I know).
Sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 21:06 [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU prep series part 1 Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: Add member to struct kvm_gfn_range for target alias Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:06 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Add a VM type define for TDX Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a mirrored pointer to struct kvm_mmu_page Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a new mirror_pt member for union kvm_mmu_page_role Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-06 16:15 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_tdp_mmu_alloc_root() return void Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-06 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Support GFN direct mask Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 7:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 18:39 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08 8:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-08 9:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-09 23:25 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-07 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Extract root invalid check from tdx_mmu_next_root() Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Introduce KVM MMU root types to specify page table type Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 8:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:06 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support mirror root for TDP MMU Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:57 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-07 8:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 8:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:27 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08 9:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10 0:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-10 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10 16:00 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect building mirror page tables Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 10:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 20:52 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Reflect tearing down " Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 21:46 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-12 18:39 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-06-14 23:11 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Take root types for kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() Rick Edgecombe
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Make mmu notifier callbacks to check kvm_process Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 8:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08 9:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-10 1:06 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Invalidate correct roots Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:31 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-30 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Add a helper function to walk down the TDP MMU Rick Edgecombe
2024-06-07 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 23:39 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-08 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-12 18:56 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-06-07 11:39 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU prep series part 1 Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-07 22:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44fed65b5b7f180e912f265209269a0a2b2f8846.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox