From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question regarding cacheline size
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:04:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450042F7.5080202@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060907152147.GA17324@colo.lackof.org>
Grant Grundler wrote:
> hrm...if the driver can put a safe value in cachelinesize register
> and NOT enable MWI, I can imagine a significant performance boost
> if the device can use MRM or MRL. But IMHO it's up to the driver
> writers (or other contributors) to figure that out.
Yes.
> Current API (pci_set_mwi()) ties enabling MRM/MRL with enabling MWI
> and I don't see a really good reason for that. Only the converse
> is true - enabling MWI requires setting cachelinesize.
Correct, that's why it was done that way, when I wrote the API.
Enabling MWI required making sure the BIOS configured our CLS for us,
which was often not the case. No reason why we can't do a
pdev->set_cls = 1;
rc = pci_enable_device(pdev);
or
rc = pci_set_cacheline_size(pdev);
Regards,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-07 8:31 question regarding cacheline size Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 11:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-07 11:20 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 12:07 ` Russell King
2006-09-07 12:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-07 12:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-07 12:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-07 12:53 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 13:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-07 13:19 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 15:21 ` Grant Grundler
2006-09-07 15:47 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-07 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-07 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-07 16:04 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-09-22 23:47 ` Grant Grundler
2006-09-07 13:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-07 13:10 ` Russell King
2006-09-07 13:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-07 13:02 ` Russell King
2006-09-07 11:59 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450042F7.5080202@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox