public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edward Falk <efalk@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt?
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:13:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4500D1E6.7020805@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.3.1157626801.14788.linux-kernel-daily-digest@lists.us.dell.com>

Hi all; there's a few lines of code in fs/proc/base.c:proc_pid_cmdline() 
that I'm unable to make sense of.  There are a few lines that check the 
returned buffer to see if it's properly nul-terminated.  If not, the 
code assumes the user has overwritten and corrupted the command line buffer.

The next step is to search for the first embedded nul, and truncate the 
buffer at that point.

If no embedded nul is found, enough data is copied from the user's 
environment to fill the buffer.  Another search for an embedded nul is 
then made.

Does anybody know what on earth this code is trying to accomplish?  Is 
this the intended behavior?  The best I can guess is that the user is 
assumed to have overwritten the end of the command line buffer and that 
the environment buffer is assumed to immediately follow the command line 
buffer.

I'm currently working on a patch that removes the one page limit on the 
returned command line buffer but I'm not convinced I should retain this 
behavior.  Is it possible that there's any code out there that depends 
on this behavior.  It would help if I knew why it was done this way.

TIA,
	-ed falk, efalk@google.com

       reply	other threads:[~2006-09-08  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.3.1157626801.14788.linux-kernel-daily-digest@lists.us.dell.com>
2006-09-08  2:13 ` Edward Falk [this message]
2006-09-08  8:11   ` Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt? Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 17:16     ` Edward Falk
2006-09-08 20:05       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 21:21         ` Edward Falk
2006-09-11  6:03           ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4500D1E6.7020805@google.com \
    --to=efalk@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox