From: Edward Falk <efalk@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt?
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:13:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4500D1E6.7020805@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.3.1157626801.14788.linux-kernel-daily-digest@lists.us.dell.com>
Hi all; there's a few lines of code in fs/proc/base.c:proc_pid_cmdline()
that I'm unable to make sense of. There are a few lines that check the
returned buffer to see if it's properly nul-terminated. If not, the
code assumes the user has overwritten and corrupted the command line buffer.
The next step is to search for the first embedded nul, and truncate the
buffer at that point.
If no embedded nul is found, enough data is copied from the user's
environment to fill the buffer. Another search for an embedded nul is
then made.
Does anybody know what on earth this code is trying to accomplish? Is
this the intended behavior? The best I can guess is that the user is
assumed to have overwritten the end of the command line buffer and that
the environment buffer is assumed to immediately follow the command line
buffer.
I'm currently working on a patch that removes the one page limit on the
returned command line buffer but I'm not convinced I should retain this
behavior. Is it possible that there's any code out there that depends
on this behavior. It would help if I knew why it was done this way.
TIA,
-ed falk, efalk@google.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-08 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1157626801.14788.linux-kernel-daily-digest@lists.us.dell.com>
2006-09-08 2:13 ` Edward Falk [this message]
2006-09-08 8:11 ` Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt? Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 17:16 ` Edward Falk
2006-09-08 20:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 21:21 ` Edward Falk
2006-09-11 6:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4500D1E6.7020805@google.com \
--to=efalk@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox