From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:16:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45013506.1090500@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2006-09-07-18-44-52+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net>
Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>>>>>>"Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> writes:
>
>
> Sam> I suggest that you use the following patch instead. [...] I
> Sam> disable the watchdog until it is first used
>
> Oops, disabling will work best if done at module initialization time :)
> Revised patch attached.
Personally I don't agree with disabling the watchdog on load.
If it is already started from the BIOS or GRUB for example,
there will be a large window of time/logic that is not protected.
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-08 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-06 10:29 [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 11:14 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-06 11:29 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 11:49 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-06 12:07 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-06 12:48 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-06 19:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-07 9:57 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-07 13:24 ` Pádraig Brady
2006-09-07 16:44 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-08 9:16 ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2006-09-08 9:49 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-07 17:26 ` Jim Cromie
2006-09-07 18:06 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-08 12:22 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-09 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 15:18 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 15:33 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 15:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 15:38 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 16:28 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 21:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 22:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-09 22:27 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 18:02 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-09-09 18:35 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-11 5:50 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-09-13 19:15 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-14 7:15 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-09-14 7:05 ` [RFC-patch 0/3] SuperIO locks coordinator (was: watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip) Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 7:13 ` [RFC-patch 1/3] SuperIO locks coordinator Jim Cromie
2006-09-17 17:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-09-14 7:16 ` [RFC-patch 2/3] " Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 7:20 ` [RFC-patch 3/3] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in pc8736x_gpio Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 21:58 ` [RFC-patch 0/3] SuperIO locks coordinator Jim Cromie
[not found] ` <4dfa50520609141753h34e54fdayba62f1b127d58036@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <450A54EB.1020305@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4dfa50520609151118s65a980b4td143a9fbbfeb1798@mail.gmail.com>
2006-09-16 17:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Jim Cromie
2006-09-19 13:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45013506.1090500@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@rfc1149.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox