From: Edward Falk <efalk@google.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt?
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:16:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4501A583.2050500@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609080919130.22545@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>>that the environment buffer is assumed to immediately follow the
>>command line buffer.
>
>
> The environment buffer is not assumed to be there, it is _known_ to come right
> after the argument string, because that is how the kernel sets it up on execve
> (for x86 at least).
Is that in a spec somewhere? Otherwise, I would argue that it isn't
_known_ to come right after the argument string, it just _happens_ to
come right after the argument string. This could change in future kernels.
>>I'm currently working on a patch that removes the one page limit on
>>the returned command line buffer but I'm not convinced I should
>>retain this behavior.
>
>
> I think yes. proc_pid_cmdline() has these lines:
>
> len = mm->arg_end - mm->arg_start
> * if (len > PAGE_SIZE)
> * len = PAGE_SIZE;
> res = access_process_vm(task, mm->arg_start, buffer, len, 0);
>
>
> and @buffer is allocated in the caller as only one page:
True, but that's an arbitrary limitation which I'm in the process of
removing. I have a new version of proc_pid_cmdline() which will return
the entire commandline buffer no matter what its length. If the
grab-more-data-from-environment-buffer behavior is actually broken, I'd
rather not propagate it to the new code.
-ed falk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-08 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1157626801.14788.linux-kernel-daily-digest@lists.us.dell.com>
2006-09-08 2:13 ` Proper /proc/pid/cmdline behavior when command line is corrupt? Edward Falk
2006-09-08 8:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 17:16 ` Edward Falk [this message]
2006-09-08 20:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 21:21 ` Edward Falk
2006-09-11 6:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4501A583.2050500@google.com \
--to=efalk@google.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox