From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964992AbWIIXHS (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:07:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964993AbWIIXHR (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:07:17 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:54964 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964992AbWIIXHQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:07:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4503491F.6080101@goop.org> Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:07:11 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060907) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda updates References: <45027822.2010906@goop.org> <20060909155257.GA50136@muc.de> In-Reply-To: <20060909155257.GA50136@muc.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > I think i would prefer to merge that and the 1 byte one only > with actual users (x86-64 hasn't needed either for a long time) Taking the address of a PDA field is pretty useful. And it is going to be important for a subsequent patch. J