* uswsusp oddity
@ 2006-09-12 14:08 Andreas Steinmetz
2006-09-12 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Steinmetz @ 2006-09-12 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek, Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist
I just tried uswsusp 0.2 and there is a strange problem (2.6.17.8, x86_64):
The swap device used for suspend must be the first swap device,
otherwise suspend fails.
Contents of /etc/suspend.conf:
snapshot device = /dev/snapshot
resume device = /dev/hda2
#image size = 350000000
suspend loglevel = 7
#compute checksum = y
#compress = y
#encrypt = y
early writeout = y
#splash = y
Output of /proc/swaps of the failing suspend:
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/mapper/swap1 partition 1959920 0 2
/dev/mapper/swap2 partition 1959888 0 3
/dev/hda2 partition 1959920 0 1
Relevant portion of strace of suspend utility:
mlockall(MCL_CURRENT|MCL_FUTURE) = 0
stat("/dev/hda2", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(3, 2), ...}) = 0
open("/dev/hda2", O_RDWR) = 3
stat("/dev/snapshot", {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(10, 231),
...}) = 0
open("/dev/snapshot", O_RDONLY) = 4
ioctl(4, 0x4004330a, 0x302) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
write(2, "suspend: Could not use the resum"..., 57suspend: Could not use
the res
ume device (try swapon -a)
There seems to be something wrong with the SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_FILE ioctl.
If I do the following sequence suspend works:
swapoff -a
swapon -p 1 /dev/hda2
swapon -a
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: uswsusp oddity
2006-09-12 14:08 uswsusp oddity Andreas Steinmetz
@ 2006-09-12 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2006-09-12 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Steinmetz; +Cc: Pavel Machek, Linux Kernel Mailinglist
On Tuesday, 12 September 2006 16:08, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> I just tried uswsusp 0.2 and there is a strange problem (2.6.17.8, x86_64):
>
> The swap device used for suspend must be the first swap device,
> otherwise suspend fails.
This is a known issue, happens also in swsusp. It should be fixed in 2.6.18.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-12 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-12 14:08 uswsusp oddity Andreas Steinmetz
2006-09-12 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox