From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@suse.de,
ebiederm@xmission.com, arjan@infradead.org, zach@vmware.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Assignment of GDT entries
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:11:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4508F279.6010205@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <787b0d920609132023t1686525ei9c1703b044029909@mail.gmail.com>
Albert Cahalan wrote:
> We actually have an ABI problem right now because of this.
> Note that i386 and x86_64 use different GDT slots.
>
> As far as I can tell, users need to hard-code the mapping
> from TLS slot to segment number. They use 0,1,2 to ask the
> kernel to set things up (via set_thread_area), but can't
> just pop that into %fs or %gs.
That's not true at all. The program I posted earlier in this thread
uses set_thread_area() to allocate a GDT slot, and it works on both
native 32 bit and 32-under-64. The entry_number field in the struct
user_desc is an actual entry number, so you can easily construct a
selector from it.
> Typical hacks that result from this:
>
> call uname() and look for "x86_64"
> see of the addresses of local variables exceed 0xbfffffff
> examine /proc/1/maps
> check for a /lib64 directory
> change SSE register 8 in a signal handler frame and see if it sticks
> checksum the vdso code
> ...
>
> Please save us from these foul hacks.
Er, that all looks completely unnecessary.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-14 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-14 3:23 Assignment of GDT entries Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 6:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-15 7:55 Mikael Pettersson
2006-09-15 8:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-15 8:58 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-09-15 18:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-14 4:06 Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 4:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-14 6:19 ` Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 6:28 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-14 7:12 ` Albert Cahalan
2006-09-14 7:24 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-14 6:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 18:58 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 19:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-13 20:00 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-13 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 20:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 20:59 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-13 21:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 21:35 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-14 0:25 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-09-14 1:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2006-09-14 13:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-13 19:55 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-09-13 20:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 20:32 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-09-13 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-13 21:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-13 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-13 22:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-14 6:00 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4508F279.6010205@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=acahalan@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox