Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

Roman Zippel
2006-09-17T16:03:15Z

Hi,

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > The foremost issue is still that there is only limited kprobes
> > support.
>
> > The main issue in supporting static tracers are the tracepoints and so
> > far I haven't seen any convincing proof that the maintainance overhead
> > of dynamic and static tracepoints has to be significantly different.
>
> to both points i (and others) already replied in great detail - please
> follow up on them. (I can quote message-IDs if you cannot find them.)

What you basically tell me is (rephrased to make it more clear): Implement
kprobes support or fuck off! You make it very clear, that you're unwilling
to support static tracers even to point to make _any_ static trace support
impossible. It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're
absolutely unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do
than it's very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise
anyway? You leave me _nothing_ to work with, that's the main reason I
leave such things unanswered. AFAICT there is nothing I can do about that
than just repeating what I told you already anyway and you'll continue to
ignore it and I'm sick and tired of it.

bye, Roman