From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964828AbWIPQ1h (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:27:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964830AbWIPQ1h (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:27:37 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:30890 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964828AbWIPQ1g (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:27:36 -0400 Message-ID: <450C25F5.1020307@garzik.org> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:27:33 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Tejun Heo , Tom Mortensen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.x libata resync References: <20060916053713.GJ541@1wt.eu> <450B9940.5030609@gmail.com> <20060916063808.GK541@1wt.eu> <450C1CF2.4080308@garzik.org> <20060916155141.GA18409@1wt.eu> <450C2134.7040200@garzik.org> <20060916160520.GB18409@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20060916160520.GB18409@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Willy Tarreau wrote: > Of course for those. I was thinking about those which just change one > register or things like this that I cannot identify the expected effect. > If you agree, I'll enumerate the ones I've already noticed so that you > just have to say yes/no/unknown on them. Don't worry, I don't want to > spend lots of hours on this, since as I said, I do not receive any > feedback from SATA users on 2.4 (neither positive nor negative). I'm more than happy to review any 2.4 libata patches people post. Jeff