From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler tunables?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:19:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450D6786.7010404@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158483845.6025.22.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 19:19 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> It looks like the scheduler tunables have been removed from 2.6
>> somewhere before 2.6.17.
>
> Which tunables are you referring to?
>
>
http://kerneltrap.org/node/525
The relevant code changes in sysctl.h and sched.c seem to be undone. Of
course I'm assuming my distribution didn't just add a side patch in at
the time when I noticed these existed so long ago.
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Bosc, Evil alien overlord from the fifth dimension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=qLt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-17 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-16 23:19 Scheduler tunables? John Richard Moser
2006-09-17 9:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-09-17 15:19 ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-09-17 19:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-09-17 18:47 ` John Richard Moser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450D6786.7010404@comcast.net \
--to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox