Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

Randy.Dunlap
2006-09-22T17:30:24Z

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:10:01 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:54 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > mtd-maps-ixp4xx-partition-parsing.patch
> > > fix-the-unlock-addr-lookup-bug-in-mtd-jedec-probe.patch
> > > mtd-printk-format-warning.patch
> > > fs-jffs2-jffs2_fs_ih-removal-of-old-code.patch
> > > drivers-mtd-nand-au1550ndc-removal-of-old-code.patch
> > >
> > > MTD queue -> dwmw2
> >
> > Merged, with the exception of the unlock addr one which I'm still not
> > sure about -- about to investigate harder.
>
> I just reverted Randy's printk format 'fix', since rq->flags _is_ an
> unsigned long, so changing from %ld to %d actually _introduces_ a
> warning.
>
> Randy, that's the second time I recall recently that I've ended up
> reverting a printk format fix from you -- what are you doing? How did
> you manage to get the warning you reported:
>
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:72: warning: long int format, different type arg (arg 2)

That was originally posted as a patch to -mm, where that field
has been changed to (unsigned?) int. Maybe it should be part
of Jens's block patches, since that is what changes the field
size.

---
~~Randy