Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

Andrew Morton
2006-09-21T17:35:17Z

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:14:33 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> > ntp-move-all-the-ntp-related-code-to-ntpc.patch
> > ntp-move-all-the-ntp-related-code-to-ntpc-fix.patch
> > ntp-add-ntp_update_frequency.patch
> > ntp-add-ntp_update_frequency-fix.patch
> > ntp-add-time_adj-to-tick-length.patch
> > ntp-add-time_freq-to-tick-length.patch
> > ntp-prescale-time_offset.patch
> > ntp-add-time_adjust-to-tick-length.patch
> > ntp-remove-time_tolerance.patch
> > ntp-convert-time_freq-to-nsec-value.patch
> > ntp-convert-to-the-ntp4-reference-model.patch
> > ntp-cleanup-defines-and-comments.patch
> > kernel-time-ntpc-possible-cleanups.patch
> > kill-wall_jiffies.patch
> >
> > Will merge.
>
> would be nice to merge the -hrt queue that goes right ontop this queue.
> Even if HIGH_RES_TIMERS is "default n" in the beginning. That gives us
> high-res timers and dynticks which are both very important features to
> certain classes of users/devices.
>
> The current queue is at:
>
> http://tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.18/
>

I've never even looked at this work. Just add it to the pipeline I guess.
We can merge it once it passes review by Roman ;)

But the possible problems with the NTP patches which John has possibly
observed were news to me - it's not clear what the situation is there.