From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:03:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45134472.7080002@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45131334.6050803@sandeen.net>
Hi Eric,
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> The inode diet patch in -mm unhooked xfs_preferred_iosize from the stat call:
>
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ vn_revalidate_core(
> inode->i_blocks = vap->va_nblocks;
> inode->i_mtime = vap->va_mtime;
> inode->i_ctime = vap->va_ctime;
> - inode->i_blksize = vap->va_blocksize;
> if (vap->va_xflags & XFS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE)
>
> This in turn breaks the largeio mount option for xfs:
>
> largeio/nolargeio
> If "nolargeio" is specified, the optimal I/O reported in
> st_blksize by stat(2) will be as small as possible to allow user
> applications to avoid inefficient read/modify/write I/O.
> If "largeio" specified, a filesystem that has a "swidth" specified
> will return the "swidth" value (in bytes) in st_blksize. If the
> filesystem does not have a "swidth" specified but does specify
> an "allocsize" then "allocsize" (in bytes) will be returned
> instead.
> If neither of these two options are specified, then filesystem
> will behave as if "nolargeio" was specified.
>
> and the (undocumented?) allocsize mount option as well.
>
> For a filesystem like this with sunit/swidth specified,
>
> meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=512 agcount=32, agsize=7625840 blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=0
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=244026880, imaxpct=25
> = sunit=16 swidth=16 blks, unwritten=1
> naming =version 2 bsize=4096
> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks
> realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
> stat on a stock FC6 kernel w/ the largeio mount option returns only the page size:
>
> [root@link-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
> [root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
> 4096
>
> with the following patch, it does what it should:
>
> [root@link-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
> [root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
> 65536
>
> same goes for filesystems w/o sunit,swidth but with the allocsize mount option.
>
> stock:
> [root@link-07]# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
> [root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
> 4096
>
> w/ patch:
> [root@link-07# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
> [root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
> 32768
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
>
> XFS guys, does this look ok?
>
> Index: linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
> +++ linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -623,12 +623,16 @@ xfs_vn_getattr(
> {
> struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> bhv_vnode_t *vp = vn_from_inode(inode);
> + xfs_inode_t *ip;
> int error = 0;
>
> if (unlikely(vp->v_flag & VMODIFIED))
> error = vn_revalidate(vp);
> - if (!error)
> + if (!error) {
> generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
> + ip = xfs_vtoi(vp);
> + stat->blksize = xfs_preferred_iosize(ip->i_mount);
> + }
> return -error;
> }
>
Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and
the existing code is different than what yours is based on.
I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this:
----------------------------
revision 1.254
date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05; author: nathans; state: Exp; lines: +20 -5
modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a
Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure
----------------------------
I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old).
I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them.
So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
one above).
Cheers,
Tim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-22 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-21 22:33 [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch Eric Sandeen
2006-09-22 1:03 ` David Chinner
2006-09-22 2:03 ` Timothy Shimmin [this message]
2006-09-22 2:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-09-22 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-22 23:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-09-22 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 8:02 ` Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45134472.7080002@sgi.com \
--to=tes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox