From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750950AbWIZFFA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:05:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750939AbWIZFE7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:04:59 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:26720 "EHLO mga03.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750949AbWIZFE7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:04:59 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,217,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="122908552:sNHT854837893" Message-ID: <4518B451.4080303@intel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:02:09 -0700 From: Auke Kok User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000 References: <20060923003240.GF29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> <45186F87.8080207@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <45186F87.8080207@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > applied > Thanks, I have no idea why and when these annotations were lost, but we have them in much older versions of the code. I'll try to track it down and make sure that it doesn't disappear again. Cheers, Auke