From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Jim Paradis <jparadis@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jdmason@kudzu.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:03:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451E40DF.30406@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060930093421.GP22787@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:31:16AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:03:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>> hmmmm. What kernels did you test?
>> mainline as of today + several unrelated Calgary patches I'll post
>> shortly + your PCI domains patch + my Calgary patch. I'll test with
>> iommu=off next.
>>
>>> That should narrow down the problems. A problem with aic94xx sorta
>>> sounds like something unrelated.
>> Not necessarily - Calgary is an isolating IOMMU, meaning that if we
>> set up a mapping for aic94xx in the wrong IO space due to a Calgary
>> bug, aic94xx will fall over and die. Usually however this happens a
>> lot sooner. Also, we have code in Calgary to detect when an errant DMA
>> happens and it hasn't triggered in this case.
>
> Ok, turns out it's neither a PCI domains nor Calgary issue, since I
> can reproduce it on mainline with iommu=off. Must be an aic94xx
> issue, I'll send the details to linux-scsi in a bit.
Would you also make sure that Andrew has the necessary bits to keep
Calgary going under PCI domains? If it's a patch that sits on top of
linux-2.6.git + my patch, I can merge it into misc-2.6.git#pciseg (which
automatically goes into -mm). Otherwise, make sure -mm has the stack of
patches necessary.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-30 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-26 19:15 [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support Jeff Garzik
2006-09-26 20:23 ` Greg KH
2006-09-26 20:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-26 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-27 4:40 ` Greg KH
2006-09-27 7:28 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2006-09-28 9:33 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-28 9:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-28 22:45 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-28 23:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-28 23:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-30 9:34 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-30 10:03 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-09-30 10:42 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-30 11:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-30 11:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-30 17:51 ` [PATCH] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU: update to work with PCI domains Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-01 3:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-29 13:43 ` [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support Jon Mason
2006-09-29 17:11 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-09-29 18:24 ` Jon Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451E40DF.30406@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=jparadis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox