From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932100AbWJARbo (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:31:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932101AbWJARbo (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:31:44 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:53186 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932100AbWJARbn (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:31:43 -0400 Message-ID: <451FFB7E.1090609@goop.org> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:31:42 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Linux Kernel , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: x86 BUG bug References: <451FA997.9050000@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <451FA997.9050000@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Being rusty on the gcc asm syntax -- does an inline asm statement > permit 'noreturn'? -- I figured it would be best just to report this, > rather than create a patch myself. I'm reworking BUG at the moment, and I noticed this as well. I'll try to fix it. J