From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Panic from mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work in 2.6.18-mm2
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:32:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4521AF8D.4050209@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061002163733.610a3c1f.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:21:08 -0600
> "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, October 02, 2006 2:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, Bryce@osdl is hitting this. Apparently it can be worked around
>>> by compiling the driver as a module.
>>>
>> What I saw in Bryces trace was the driver was not receiving interrupts
>> for
>> the first command sent after interrutps were enabled. This was a config
>> page
>> for spi port pages. Since this command timed out, an internal timeout
>> handler was called,
>> and we issued an internal host reset. The host reset called each
>> driver,
>> such as mptspi, mptfc, mptsas, callback handers. That ended with
>> as pacin in mptspi, due to we assume ioc->hd to be a valid pointer.
>> We don't allocate ioc->hd to well after mpt_attach, which is where the
>> config
>> page that timed out. We could prevent the panic in mptspi, but that
>> doesn't fix the problem why we are not getting interrupts.
>>
>> I have a 2.6.18 gold kernel, and that works fine with modules.
>> There are no changes in mpt stack since 2.6.18 that would effect
>> interrupts.
>> Do you know of any changes in kernel effecting interrupts? I suspect
>> that
>> modules versus linked drivers into kernel would matter, or would it?
>
> There are lots and lots of interrupt changes, some now in mainline, some
> not.
>
> There's a known-problematic PCI resource allocation bug now in mainline
> too. It appears that this can cause devices to not get assigned an
> interrupt.
>
> So yes, this is probably the trigger. But as a secondary thing, it appears
> that the driver will crash if something goes wrong with the interrupt
> setup?
FWIW, I am seeing precisely this problem, in the latest -git.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-03 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 23:21 Panic from mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work in 2.6.18-mm2 Moore, Eric
2006-10-02 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03 0:32 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-10-03 0:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03 0:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-03 1:35 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-02 20:10 Martin Bligh
2006-10-02 20:39 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4521AF8D.4050209@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox