From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:40:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45240034.2040704@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004111603.20cdaa35.akpm@osdl.org>
> We have lots of nice new tools in-kernel which permit applications to
> manipulate and to invalidate pagecache. Please, start using them rather
> than pushing bits of oracle into the core vfs ;)
And apps that were written before they were available? :) We're OK with
their behaviour changing under newer kernels because they now have a
previous source of memory pressure that they didn't have before?
It seems a bit much to suggest that retaining the previous behaviour of
avoiding memory pressure by using the O_DIRECT API is somehow "pushing
bits of oracle into the core vfs" :).
Maybe that aspect of the API was unintentional, though. That would be a
shame. I suspect Oracle isn't alone in relying on it.
> Please, no truncate_inode_pages. For this application, the far-safer
> invalidate_inode_pages() would suffice.
So now apps always have to pay the cost of looking up pages to
invalidate on the off chance that they wrote to a sparse region, based
on the current implementation detail that sparse regions fall back to
buffered?
- z
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-04 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 17:04 [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 17:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 17:51 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-04 17:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 18:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 18:40 ` Zach Brown [this message]
2006-10-04 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 20:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 21:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-05 19:31 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-06 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-11 16:48 ` jmoyer
2006-10-11 18:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 22:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-12 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45240034.2040704@oracle.com \
--to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox