Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system

Paul Menage
2006-10-04T21:42:56Z

On 10/4/06, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > All of this (and the rest of the snipped email with suggested
> > improvements) makes pretty good sense. But would it not be better
> > to do this in stages?
> >
> > 1) Split the code out from cpusets
>
> Paul (Menage) is already work on this.

The split out is done - right now I'm tidying up an example of RG
moved over the container API - basically dumping the group membership
code (since container.c supplies that) and migrating the shares/stats
file model to containerfs rather than configfs. I'll try to send it
out today.

Paul